Cities continue to grow at a rapid rate. Within the 100 Resilient Cities Network, more than half of the cities in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa are seeing their population expand by 2% or more annually – the benchmark of rapid urban growth. A metropolis like Lagos, Nigeria demonstrates how drastic this can be: increasing from 7.1 million to 9.8 million residents between 2000 and 2015, its population is expected to more than triple to 34 million by 2050. To begin to understand what this means for urban resilience, 100RC has collaborated with New York University’s Marron Institute to develop urban growth projections for twenty of our most rapidly expanding cities located in the Global South.
A growing population may increase density in central areas, but it also has the effect of dramatically expanding a city’s physical boundaries. Population density in cities is, on average, declining by 2% per year, and almost every city globally is experiencing significant spatial expansion as a result – including some that have no population growth, and even a few that are losing population. Nairobi, Kenya, for example, is forecasted to increase its total area 5.3-fold by 2050; in that same time frame, the twenty cities in this study will on average increase their total area 3.7-fold. As these cities continue growing outward, a significant amount of work must be undertaken to not only provide for projected expansion but also to guide its development. Almost all of the infrastructure that will have to accommodate this growth has yet to be built, presenting a significant opportunity to plan for expansion in an efficient and equitable manner that contributes to the city’s overall resilience.
To be truly impactful, a city Resilience Strategy must not only consider existing urban areas but also account for projected urban growth and use it as an opportunity to accelerate resilience-building. Failure to plan and organize the expansion areas of cities is the root cause of a number of serious resilience challenges including: housing affordability, traffic congestion, poor access to labor markets and public space, natural hazard risk to communities, loss of natural environment and ecosystems, and lack of basic services such as water, sanitation, and electricity. It also costs more. The expense of bringing critical infrastructure into existing communities is 3 to 9 times higher than the cost of installing the basic trunk infrastructure in planned communities, incrementally, in advance of development.
Satellite imagery at three discrete points in time (1990, 2000, and 2014) has been used to assess the quantity and quality of the urban growth in this period and to support the development of urban growth projections through 2050. Here we present a handful of key indicators that the Marron Institute uses to characterize the quality of urban growth, each of which has particular implications for urban resilience: average city block size, street width, proximity of residential areas to arterial roads, and percentage of open space available for residents.
Quantifying Urban Expansion
As cities grow, they must also contend with administrative and geographic boundaries. Once an urban center expands beyond a single jurisdiction, the resulting regional fragmentation adds extra complexity to city governance and must be factored into planning processes. This challenge is currently being confronted by several metropolitan areas within the 100RC Network. For example, the UK city of Manchester and its surrounding boroughs came together in 2010 as the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, thereby giving more planning autonomy to the metropolitan region, rather than each council independently planning for a system that affects the metropolitan area as a whole.
Da Nang, Vietnam, has the highest urban growth rate within the 100RC network; the metro area expanded by 5.6% annually between 2000 and 2014. Most of its recent growth extended well beyond the city’s administrative boundaries and into adjoining areas. This poses challenges for integrated spatial planning and may call for more active regional planning to compensate for the resulting fragmentation, as described above.
The shape of a city as it grows also has implications for urban resilience planning. The image above demonstrates that over the years, Can Tho has elongated and become less dense. This has significant impacts on transportation within the urbanized area, where the average commuting time to the city center becomes higher than in more circular cities and where greater difficulties arise in managing an extended system. Already existing environmental challenges caused by pollution are additionally exacerbated, meaning that urban form holds a direct impact on a city’s chronic stresses.
Streets and Walkability
Multimodal streets are a unique characteristic of urban areas. Four-way intersections in particular improve accessibility not only for drivers, but also for pedestrians and cyclists. They minimize trip distance for greater walkability and cycling as well as increase route options, which in turn can decrease congestion and vehicular traffic.
The average size of a city block also affects how accessible a neighborhood is. Residential blocks that measure more than 4 to 5 hectares begin to impede walkability, by increasing the distance between points. In Cali, Colombia, for example, the city’s older area is easier to navigate on foot than its newly-developed districts. A city’s level of walkability is important for promoting public health objectives, cohesive and engaged communities, and a number of other urban resilience benefits.
When planned effectively, arterial roads support urban resilience by linking residents to jobs, providing vulnerable and underserved communities access to basic services like water and power, and allowing for generally greater mobility around a city. Arterial roads carry public transportation and trunk infrastructure such as water supply, power and telecommunications and, as a public good, must be planned and implemented through government action. They are far more cost-effective and efficient to provide if created in anticipation of settlement, before development occurs in that area.
Ideally, every resident would live within walking distance of a road that can efficiently carry public transportation – even if that system is not yet in place. For this reason, the Marron Institute has studied the proximity of built-up areas to arterial roads as a key metric in the quality of urban expansion; it has additionally developed the Making Room methodology of planning a grid of arterial roads in areas of projected urban expansion and working with local government to secure rights of way to these corridors in advance of development.
Based on overall global trends, the cities in the study are expected to continue their outward expansion, declining in urban density at an annual rate of 1-2%, while increasing their land consumption in some cases up to 7-fold by 2050. The graphic below organizes the participating cities by their expected population growth rates, and shows their projected growth in area over the next 35 years. In that timeframe, Can Tho, the fastest-growing city from 2000-2010, is expected to experience population growth of 114% and add as much as 26,000ha to its territory, representing a 5-fold increase in total area. Medellin, on the other hand, is on a path toward a 40% increase in population and add as much as 43,600ha, or a 1.6-fold increase in total area.
The 20 cities in the NYU study are currently working to incorporate these findings into their Resilience Strategy development and implementation. We hope the findings will influence existing project development and lead to new initiatives focused on planning in advance for urban growth in a way that supports the broader resilience of cities.
About NYU’s Marron Institute
The Urban Expansion Program, supported jointly by NYU’s Stern Business School and Marron Institute, works with rapidly growing cities to make room for their inevitable expansion. The program has a “stakes-in-the-ground” orientation—a focus on real and tangible results in rapidly growing cities – working with municipal officials and their colleagues at the regional and national levels to make realistic long-term preparations for urban expansion in multiple countries around the world. To better understand the growth of cities, the program also monitors urban expansion in a sample of 200 global cities—collecting and analyzing data on the quantity and quality of urbanization. By focusing on a representative sample, the Monitoring initiative provides researchers with better information from which to draw inferences about how and why urbanization is happening around the world, and what it means for outcomes such as housing affordability and the spatial organization of cities.
Editing by Alex Quinto and Nicole Bohrer.